![]() "I think it’s kind of the thing where enough time has passed that I think it won’t matter if we wait five more years to do it." "I think Paul’s probably going to do one or two other films that he’s got kind of cooking but after that ," he continued. If the pair should decide to work with Universal Pictures again on Bourne 5, it will have to be a few years into the future as Greengrass has other projects lined up first. I’ve always said I won’t do it without him and I think it would be a bad idea to do it without Paul." It’s really up to Paul Greengrass, the director. In speaking with The Hollywood Reporter, Damon spoke honestly of his hopes and the situation. But again, that depends on Paul Greengrass' return as Matt Damon is very hopeful that he can play Bourne again a few years down the line. If it does well, we can guarantee another sequel for the new character or Bourne's, or even a mix of the two where they work together. As for who will play the new covert elite, the latest rumors have James Franco as a candidate for the part. We don't know much about the history of this new character other than he's an assassin who went through the same training/brainwashing Bourne went through. Instead, Tony Gilroy was brought in to write and direct the fourth Bourne installment which will have nothing to do with the story of Eric Lustbader’s novel for which they're using the title from. The main reason Damon isn't back for Legacy is because he has publicly stated on many occasions that he will not make a Bourne movie without Paul.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |